When a private company wants to go public and offer its shares to the public, it typically has two primary options: that is, it must not place Ardonly pursue an Initial Public Offering (IPO) or a direct listing. When it comes to the investors it is necessary to determine what separates these two approaches to make the right choice for oneself. IPO and Direct Listing: Comparing the two, considering the advantages and disadvantages of one over the other, and determining which is better for investors will be the focus of this article.
What is an IPO?
An Initial Public Offering (IPO) is the oldest and perhaps the most popular method through which companies can go for flotation. In an IPO, a company approaches investment banks or underwriters in the buying of shares to sell them to the public for a certain price to raise capital. These underwriters play a crucial role in setting the price of the stock, controlling the demand for the stock, and usually taking up a small fraction of the shares and then offering it to the public.
Table of Contents
Key features of an IPO: Key features of an IPO:
- Underwriter Involvement: it is argued that investment banks have a great role in ensuring the initial share price and the demand for these shares.
- New Shares: New shares are normally offered to existing and new investors whereby the company gets a chance to source capital for its future development.
- Roadshows: Before floating the shares in the public market, the company takes its team to road shows to market its shares to institutional investors.
- Lock-Up Periods: Managers and initial investors are restricted from selling their stocks for some time; this time is called the lock-up period and usually lasts for six months.
What is Direct Listing?
Direct listing on the other hand is another method of going public that’s relatively newer than the latter. It enables a firm to dispose of shares it holds to the public without having to float new shares or hire underwriters. Direct listings do not replace IPO and promise to be less expensive and more transparent means of going public.
Key features of a direct listing: Key features of a direct listing:
No New Shares: Moreso, a direct listing involves the sale of only existing shares from employees, founders, or early investors. In this case, no new capital is sourced but is a mechanism of ranking the capital market as a way of financing.
No Underwriter:
However, companies do not go through underwriters, bear great expenses, and do not perform roadshows.
More Flexible Pricing: Another major difference is that underwriters do not set the initial price in a direct listing as they do in an IPO but it is market-determined and this is the opening price that investors obtain in the stock market.
Advantages of an IPO
Capital Generation for Growth:
The major advantage of an IPO is it offers the company the opportunity to get new equity. It can be applied to expansion, research, and development or it can be used to pay existing liabilities.
Professional Pricing Mechanism:
This is through the demonstration of research work and surveys whereby investment banks assist in determining the right initial stock price. They aim to ensure that the demand is met or fulfilled and that the business is valued in the best way possible.
Credibility and Market Exposure:
IPO makes a company to be exposed to the market more than it was, and this leads to a gain of credibility. Such presentations with the support of underwriters’ comments also encourage institutional investors and retail traders.
Controlled Liquidity:
The lock-up periods guarantee that preparers do not invoke a high supply of stocks when they go public through the IPO process since this would exert a danger of establishing volatility for shares’ worth.
Disadvantages of an IPO
High Costs:
IPOs have been cited to have a major weakness of being very costly. It involves several costs such as underwriters fees, legal fees, and costs that may be incurred from regulatory authorities. Furthermore, its requisites – IPO roadshows and marketing campaigns – tend to be costly.
Risk of Underpricing:
On some occasions, the shares are generally offered at a price that is below their real value in the market. While this might stimulate demand at the beginning, it will result in leaving the remaining cash on the table for the company.
Lock-Up Restrictions:
The lock-up period delays the chances of early investors and employees to get liquid on their shares, which may cause frustrations to those seeking to make money out of it.
The advantages of a direct listing include the following;
Cost Efficiency:
Direct offerings thus cost a lot less than the normal IPO since there are no underwriters involved. The company does not need to pay underwriting fees, nor do there exist exigent market advocacy or sales events such as road shows.
Faster Process:
Direct listing is less time-consuming and simpler than an IPO because there is no underwriting done. It reduces the paperwork, there are no underwriter negotiations needed and the company can also float in the stock market much earlier.
Market-Driven Pricing:
Some of the features of direct listing are: The price of the stock is purely driven by demand and supply factors found in the market. This may be advantageous to early investors as they get a better return as compared to an IPO where prices are fixed by underwriters.
Immediate Liquidity for Shareholders:
There are no lock-ups in direct listings, and this implies that early investors, employees, as well as insiders, can dispose of their shares as soon as they want. This provides instant liquidity.
Key Disadvantages of Direct Listing for Companies and Investors
As we have already seen, the direct listing has several advantages over other methods of floatation such as rights issue, placing and public issue, heap selling, or selling through an underwriter As we have already seen above, the direct listing also has its disadvantages as highlighted below.
No Capital Raised:
While being an IPO is different from a direct listing in that the latter does not raise any funds for the company because no shares are offered, as referred to in the equation above. This could prove to be a drawback for the firm that needs to mobilize capital to finance expansion, repay the debt, or finance new projects.
Higher Price Volatility:
Even though there is no fixed starting price for a direct listing, the price can be highly volatile. Even more so on the opening price since the price is determined by market forces which may see a drastic change in the stock’s price within the first trading session.
Less Institutional Support:
The key disadvantage of the direct listing is that companies do not get support from underwriters as opposed to the case with the traditional offerings. It may be even difficult to attract large investors as many institutions are cautious with their investments and prefer companies with brand recognition, all these without road shows and promotion campaigns.
Unstable Market Entry:
Unlike the efficiency of a company’s pricing that is provided when joining the IPO, the free float of shares in the direct listing may lead to the instability of market trends during the first trading day. This would create a rather disorderly market system, whereby investors are left to guess what just price should be.
Which one is more favorable to Investors?
That is why, having considered the benefits and drawbacks of IPOs and, in particular, direct listings, let us discuss which of them could be more beneficial for investors.
For Short-Term Traders:
Some investors might prefer IPOs to grow their wealth rapidly, for instance, businessmen dealing in stocks. The kind of pricing used for IPO and the initial publicity makes a company experience a higher price as a result of demand, particularly in instances where demand is high. However, it is important to understand that not all IPOs react well on the first day of trading on the floor. The insider’s lock-up period can also have the effect of stabilizing the price of the stock to lower the chances of a drastic drop in the price of the stock in the short run.
For Long-Term Investors:
As for the advantages of direct listing for long-term investors, it may well be that they will benefit more from this type of offering. This is because, as opposed to IPOs that are content with issues of underpricing, a direct listing has the potential of fixing to a fixed price at the start of its trading. Moreover, lock-up periods are not present and the price is not artificially set or held by certain limitations which makes the further market growth more natural. But what now seems to be missing is perhaps institutional support for the relatively new instrument as well as the vagaries that may come along with price swings that long-term investors cannot afford.
For Investors Seeking Stability:
An IPO may be preferable for those who have more desire to stabilize the stock price. Instead, an IPO comes with entities such as underwriters, the roadshow, and a lock-up period which makes the firm’s entry into the market more regulated. The disadvantage however is the underpricing which means that there are chances of losing big profits.
For Those Seeking Low-Cost Exposure: For Those Seeking Low-Cost Exposure:
It could be suitable for investors who do not wish to pay additional costs such as the underwriting fees or get entangled by the IPO pop. As underwriter fees are absent there is no excess load of cost on companies, which may be passed on to shareholders. However, for those who are interested in the long-term possibility of a certain company, this low cost can be rather attractive.
Conclusion
As has been seen, both structures of IPOs and direct listings have their unique strengths and weaknesses when it comes to investors. IPOs also guarantee stability and proper professional pricing in markets along with the possibilities of new capital generation, therefore a good match to those investors who are longing for a securely regulated and measured market entry. They have associated costs and one of the potential pitfalls which are underpricing.
On the other hand, direct listings are faster, cheaper, and more flexible where the price is determined by the market and is more liquid. This method, however, could lead to fluctuations in stock prices and offer little backup as offered by an IPO.
Which of them is ultimately a better choice is something that depends on the risk tolerance and investment objectives. While short-term traders will go for the first pop that an IPO offers, longer-term investors will prefer the real Information Transparency of the direct listing. This understanding is helpful for investors as it will allow them to distinguish between the two approaches and, therefore, choose the right one that will cater to their interests.
