In this respect, to add fuel to the fire, Amazon has recently sought a federal lawsuit about the NLRB stating that the agency is unconstitutional as well as claiming that the agency intimidated employees and interfered with the latter’s union election in one of the company’s warehouses more than two years ago. The case filed on Thursday in a federal court in San Antonio raises rather long-standing legal issues that might have rather dramatic implications for the near future of labor rights protection in the United States.
Table of Contents
The Legal Case Amazon vs The National Labour Relations Board
Amazon’s recent lawsuit follows prior accusations and complaints the company brought to the NLRB for defamation that the firm has had policies that discouraged employees from unionizing and punishing those who sought to form a union. This current lawsuit however also challenges the formation of the NLRB claiming that the agency is unconstitutional.
To Amazon’s legal department the issue is traced to a case the NLRB filed in March 2022. This lawsuit comes a week before a union voting took place at a Staten Island warehouse in New York where workers approved unionization. Amazon argued that the lawsuit to reinstate a union organizer interfered with the wish of the people, violated its rights, and influenced the election in the process. In the papers they have filed, Amazon argues that this amounts to undue influence, and makes the election process unfair.
The Author’s View on NLRB’s Decisions on Amazon’s Objections to the Union Election
Amazon has therefore continuously continued protesting the election results claiming that the NLRB’s actions towards the building of the union were wrong. Although the company has tried to have the election results nullified its appeal was recently denied by the NLRB board last month shutting the agency’s internal procedures. This new legal fight can then be seen as Amazon’s attempt at trying to move the issue out of the NLRB’s realm.
This is according to the lawyers who representing Amazon, claiming that the NLRB board members who signed the injunction in 2022 also considered Amazon’s objection to the election. According to the company, this is a moot point since it violates the company’s clause of due process; these members cannot be removed by the president; the structure violates the constitution. They also claim that this prejudice is the company’s right to a jury trial as stipulated in the constitution.
Generalized Consequences for Labour Rights
It is however equally important to note that other big companies apart from Amazon are also challenging the agents of this NLRB. Companies such as SpaceX and Trader Joe along with its CEO Elon Musk have also filed similar legal actions to those of McDonald’s which forms part of the growing trend going against the labor board’s enforcement rights.
Nevertheless, as Blado K said, the NLRB for the United States was constitutional in 1937 according to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States. The applicants quoted her as saying that it is big companies that try to act unlawfully against the agency saying that the legal process takes time but justice is always served.
Amazon’s Legal Objectives and Implication for the Company
Amazon wants a stop order against the NLRB from proceeding with what it terms unconstitutional administrative procedures against the firm. This legal case illustrates the conflict between large business entities and the government agencies who are assumed with the responsibility of implementing and upholding the labor laws.
NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo appointed by President Joe Biden, has also said that these lawsuits serve to deflect attention from corporate violations of labor laws. She states that through such actions, Amazon among other firms seeks to challenge the legal formality of its unlawful conduct while at the same time creating a fallacious narrative.
What Is the Future of Amazon and NLRB?
In this case, it is going to be important to analyze how the courts deal with Amazon’s allegations and whether this fight will open the door for other businesses wishing to restrain the powers of the NLRB. The impact could extend and define the prospects of the existence of labor rights and, in turn, the competency of the agency in executing the current labor laws.
